NWU Institutional Repository

Comparative analysis of two conceptual frameworks to measure creativity at a university

dc.contributor.authorFields, Ziska
dc.contributor.authorBisschoff, Christo
dc.contributor.researchID10196145 - Bisschoff, Christo Alfonzo
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-09T06:30:39Z
dc.date.available2017-05-09T06:30:39Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractCreativity is often misunderstood due to inconsistencies concerning the definition of creativity, the methodologies used to explain creativity as a phenomenon and the various measurement instruments to determine creative ability. This article aimed to compare two conceptual frameworks to identify the most reliable and valid conceptual framework to measure creativity at a university. The findings showed that both conceptual frameworks are different in their own right and both are valid and reliable. Only marginal differences could be observed from the statistical tests used in the comparative analysis. The uniqueness and value of the paper lies in the validation of these conceptual frameworks to measure creativity.en_US
dc.identifier.citationFields, Z. & Bisschoff, C. 2014. Comparative analysis of two conceptual frameworks to measure creativity at a university. Problems and perspectives in management, 12(3):46-58. [http://businessperspectives.org/journals/problems-and-perspectives-in-management/issue-42/comparative-analysis-of-two-conceptual-frameworks-to-measure-creativity-at-a-university]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1727-7051
dc.identifier.issn1810-5467 (online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/21763
dc.identifier.urihttp://businessperspectives.org/journals/problems-and-perspectives-in-management/issue-42/comparative-analysis-of-two-conceptual-frameworks-to-measure-creativity-at-a-university
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLLC “Consulting Publishing Company “Business Perspectives”en_US
dc.subjectcreativity modelsen_US
dc.subjectcreativity measurement instrumentsen_US
dc.subjectfactorsen_US
dc.subjectcomparative analysisen_US
dc.subjectpure factorsen_US
dc.subjectPearson correlationsen_US
dc.subjectvariance explaineden_US
dc.titleComparative analysis of two conceptual frameworks to measure creativity at a universityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2014_Comparative analysis.pdf
Size:
226.61 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: