NWU Institutional Repository

Furnishing Employees with the Petition for Sequestration Constitutional and Related Issues: Stratford & Others V Investec Bank Ltd & Others 2015 (3) SA 1 (CC)

dc.contributor.authorChitimira, Howard
dc.contributor.researchID25319655 - Chitimira, Howard
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-04T09:29:09Z
dc.date.available2018-06-04T09:29:09Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractThe consistent application of s 9(4A) of the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936 (Insolvency Act) has, to date, been sometimes impeded by various interpretational challenges in the South African courts. For instance, the courts have grappled to determine whether the furnishing of the petition in terms of s 9(4A) of the Insolvency Act is peremptory or directory in nature.
dc.identifier.citationChitimira, H. 2017. Furnishing Employees with the Petition for Sequestration Constitutional and Related Issues: Stratford & Others V Investec Bank Ltd & Others 2015 (3) SA 1 (CC). SA Mercantile Law, 29:153-171. [https://journals.co.za/content/journal/10520/EJC-8c270e754]
dc.identifier.issn1015-0099
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.co.za/content/journal/10520/EJC-8c270e754
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/26957
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJuta Law
dc.titleFurnishing Employees with the Petition for Sequestration Constitutional and Related Issues: Stratford & Others V Investec Bank Ltd & Others 2015 (3) SA 1 (CC)
dc.typeArticle

Files

Collections