Furnishing Employees with the Petition for Sequestration Constitutional and Related Issues: Stratford & Others V Investec Bank Ltd & Others 2015 (3) SA 1 (CC)
Loading...
Date
Authors
Chitimira, Howard
Researcher ID
Supervisors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Juta Law
Record Identifier
Abstract
The consistent application of s 9(4A) of the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936 (Insolvency Act) has, to date, been sometimes impeded by various interpretational challenges in the South African courts. For instance, the courts have grappled to determine whether the furnishing of the petition in terms of s 9(4A) of the Insolvency Act is peremptory or directory in nature.
Sustainable Development Goals
Description
Keywords
Citation
Chitimira, H. 2017. Furnishing Employees with the Petition for Sequestration Constitutional and Related Issues: Stratford & Others V Investec Bank Ltd & Others 2015 (3) SA 1 (CC). SA Mercantile Law, 29:153-171. [https://journals.co.za/content/journal/10520/EJC-8c270e754]
