dc.contributor.author | Sebeco, Lebogang | |
dc.contributor.author | Zaaiman, Johan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-02-08T09:16:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-02-08T09:16:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Sebeco, L. & Zaaiman, J. 2021. Well-being innovation platform projects of the North-West University: Evaluative perceptions of community participants. TD: The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 17(1):1 - 12. [http://dspace.nwu.ac.za/handle/10394/3605] | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1817-4434 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2415-2005 (Online) | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10394/38314 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.4102/td.v17i1.950 | |
dc.description.abstract | Community engagement referred to approaches in which communities were involved in
activities that positively impacted their lives. Currently, higher education institutions have
community engagement high on their agenda. This article focussed on how this engagement
ought to be managed through the responses of community members to such an intervention.
It presented community members’ evaluative perceptions on the North-West University’s
(NWU) well-being innovation (WIN) platform projects in the Vaalharts community. This
research was qualitative and a case study design was followed. Through interviews and focus
groups, the perceptions of participants of the WIN platform projects were obtained. The data
used stemmed from empirical research by the Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC) and
the researchers. Although this study could reach only a limited number of project participants,
they provided valuable insights into the ways they had experienced the projects. Guided by
the Context–Focus–Profile model, a comprehensive evaluation framework was constructed for
the interview and focus groups’ schedules. The findings indicated that the community
members had positive perceptions of the projects, which had contributed most especially to
skills and self-development. However, as members of a poor community, such people are
vulnerable. To ensure that they feel respected and that projects fit their needs to ensure longlasting
benefits, the way in which community engagement was conducted was important.
Recommendations for improvement emerging from this study focussed on collaboration,
communication, monitoring and recruitment. This article thereby contributed to the debate
about higher education institutions’ involvement in community engagement and demonstrated
the value of using the Context–Focus–Profile model for evaluation purposes. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | AOSIS | en_US |
dc.subject | Higher Education Institutions | en_US |
dc.subject | North-West University | en_US |
dc.subject | Community engagement | en_US |
dc.subject | Collaboration | en_US |
dc.subject | Vaalharts | en_US |
dc.subject | WIN platform projects | en_US |
dc.subject | Context–Focus–Profile model | en_US |
dc.subject | silo | en_US |
dc.subject | Intersectional | en_US |
dc.subject | Infusion models | en_US |
dc.title | Well-being innovation platform projects of the North-West University: Evaluative perceptions of community participants | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.contributor.researchID | 13250612 - Zaaiman, Stephanus Johannes | |