Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSebeco, Lebogang
dc.contributor.authorZaaiman, Johan
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-08T09:16:20Z
dc.date.available2022-02-08T09:16:20Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationSebeco, L. & Zaaiman, J. 2021. Well-being innovation platform projects of the North-West University: Evaluative perceptions of community participants. TD: The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 17(1):1 - 12. [http://dspace.nwu.ac.za/handle/10394/3605]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1817-4434
dc.identifier.issn2415-2005 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/38314
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4102/td.v17i1.950
dc.description.abstractCommunity engagement referred to approaches in which communities were involved in activities that positively impacted their lives. Currently, higher education institutions have community engagement high on their agenda. This article focussed on how this engagement ought to be managed through the responses of community members to such an intervention. It presented community members’ evaluative perceptions on the North-West University’s (NWU) well-being innovation (WIN) platform projects in the Vaalharts community. This research was qualitative and a case study design was followed. Through interviews and focus groups, the perceptions of participants of the WIN platform projects were obtained. The data used stemmed from empirical research by the Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC) and the researchers. Although this study could reach only a limited number of project participants, they provided valuable insights into the ways they had experienced the projects. Guided by the Context–Focus–Profile model, a comprehensive evaluation framework was constructed for the interview and focus groups’ schedules. The findings indicated that the community members had positive perceptions of the projects, which had contributed most especially to skills and self-development. However, as members of a poor community, such people are vulnerable. To ensure that they feel respected and that projects fit their needs to ensure longlasting benefits, the way in which community engagement was conducted was important. Recommendations for improvement emerging from this study focussed on collaboration, communication, monitoring and recruitment. This article thereby contributed to the debate about higher education institutions’ involvement in community engagement and demonstrated the value of using the Context–Focus–Profile model for evaluation purposes.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAOSISen_US
dc.subjectHigher Education Institutionsen_US
dc.subjectNorth-West Universityen_US
dc.subjectCommunity engagementen_US
dc.subjectCollaborationen_US
dc.subjectVaalhartsen_US
dc.subjectWIN platform projectsen_US
dc.subjectContext–Focus–Profile modelen_US
dc.subjectsiloen_US
dc.subjectIntersectionalen_US
dc.subjectInfusion modelsen_US
dc.titleWell-being innovation platform projects of the North-West University: Evaluative perceptions of community participantsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.researchID13250612 - Zaaiman, Stephanus Johannes


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record