PER: 2000 Volume 3 No 2
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://repository.nwu.ac.za/handle/10394/1982
Contents
31 August 2000
Articles
- Oordrag van eiendomsreg en die vulgêre reg in die Wes-Romeinse ryk / Schutte, PJW
- Die aard van wetgewende diskresies by die Suid-Afrikaanse uitvoerende gesag / Van Rensburg, LJ
- Vrijheid van meningsuiting en godsdienst versus het non-discriminatiebeginsel / Van Schaik, F
Editorial
Three contributions on divergent themes appear in this issue:
-
The constitutional limits to the growing volume of discretionary subordinate legislative authority of the South African executive are considered, with comparative references, in the article (in Afrikaans) of Van Rensburg.
-
Van Schaik addresses the manner in which the pervasive tension between the freedom of expression and the prohibition of racial discrimination is dealt with in the law of the Netherlands, with special reference to the implementation of the Convention on the Eradication of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. This article is in Dutch.
-
The purpose of Schutte's article, written in Afrikaans, is to ascertain whether the distinction between the obligatory agreement, delivery of the thing concerned or registration, and the real agreement, as elements of the transfer of ownership, stems from Roman law or whether it emanated from the vulgar law.
Readers are kindly invited to send in their comments by means of the e-mail facility marked "Letters to the Editor".