The exercise intensity at maximal oxygen uptake (i⩒O2max): methodological issues and repeatability
| dc.contributor.author | Merry, Kevin L. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Howatson, Glyn | |
| dc.contributor.author | Glaister, Mark | |
| dc.contributor.author | Van Someren, Ken | |
| dc.contributor.researchID | 26084759 - Howatson, Glyn | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-15T08:23:26Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-05-15T08:23:26Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The minimum exercise intensity that elicits V̇O2max (iV̇O2max) is an important variable associated with endurance exercise performance. iV̇O2max is usually determined during a maximal incremental exercise test; however, the magnitude and duration of the increments used influence the iV̇O2max value produced by a given test. The aims of this study were twofold. The first was to investigate whether the iV̇O2max value produced by a single cycle ergometer test (iV̇O2max(S)) was repeatable. The second was to determine if iV̇O2max(S) represents the minimum intensity at which V̇O2max is elicited when compared to a refined iV̇O2max value (iV̇O2max(R)) derived from repeated tests. Seventeen male cyclists (age 33.9 ± 7.7 years, body mass 80.9 ± 10.2 kg, height 1.82 ± 0.05 m; VO2max 4.27 ± 0.62 L min−1) performed four maximal incremental tests for the determination of iV̇O2max(S) and iV̇O2max(R) (3 min stages; 20 W increments). Trials 1 and 2 were identical and used for assessing the repeatability of iV̇O2max(S), trials 3 and 4 began at different intensities and were used to determine iV̇O2max(R). iV̇ O2max(S) showed good test-retest repeatability for iV̇O2max (CV = 4.1%; ICC = 0.93), VO2max (CV = 6.3%; ICC = 0.88) and test duration (CV = 6.7%; ICC = 0.89). There was no significant difference between iV̇O2max(S) and iV̇O2max(R) (303 ± 40W vs. 301 ± 42 W) (P < .05). The present results suggest that iV̇O2max determined directly during a maximal incremental test is repeatable and provides a very good estimate of the minimum exercise intensity that elicits V̇O2max. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Merry, K.L. et al. 2016. The exercise intensity at maximal oxygen uptake (i⩒O2max): methodological issues and repeatability. European journal of sport science, 16(8):989-995. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2016.1183715] | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1746-1391 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1536-7290 (Online) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10394/23445 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2016.1183715 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | |
| dc.subject | Cycle ergometry | |
| dc.subject | Exercise intensity | |
| dc.subject | Maximal oxygen uptake | |
| dc.subject | Repeatability | |
| dc.title | The exercise intensity at maximal oxygen uptake (i⩒O2max): methodological issues and repeatability | |
| dc.type | Article |
