NWU Institutional Repository

Terrestrial non-parasitic nematode assemblages associated with glyphosate-tolerant and conventional soybean-based cropping systems

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Mbatyoti, Akhona
De Waele, Dirk
Fourie, Hendrika
Daneel, Mieke Stefanie
Swart, Antoinette

Supervisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Exeley

Record Identifier

Abstract

Information about the effects of glyphosate on nematodes is limited and contradictory, while none existing for South African agricultural fields. The abundance and identity of non-parasitic nematodes in the rhizospheres of commercial glyphosate-tolerant and conventional (non-glyphosate-tolerant), soybean cultivars from cultivated fields, and adjacent natural vegetation (reference system) were obtained for two growing seasons. The impact of glyphosate was also investigated on non-parasitic nematodes in a 2-year soybean-maize cropping system. Thirty-two non-parasitic nematode genera were identified from soils of the three field ecosystems, with most of the genera occurring in natural vegetation (28), and less in conventional (23) and glyphosatetolerant soybean (21). Bacterivores had the greatest diversity in soils of all three ecosystems during both seasons, while fungivores tended to be more abundant in glyphosate-tolerant soybean fields especially during the second season. Soils from the three ecosystems were disturbed and degraded with low abundance and diversity of omnivores and predators. Of the 14 genera identified from the soybean-maize cropping experiment, bacterivores dominated in terms of diversity in non-treated, and fungivores in glyphosate-treated plots. Soils from glyphosate-treated plots were degraded, less enriched and fungal-mediated, while those from non-treated plots were disturbed, enriched, and bacterial-mediated

Sustainable Development Goals

Description

Citation

Mbatyoti, A. et al. 2018. Terrestrial non-parasitic nematode assemblages associated with glyphosate-tolerant and conventional soybean-based cropping systems. Journal of nematology, 50(3):243-260. [https://doi.org/10.21307/jofnem-2018-028]

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By