NWU Institutional Repository

Rural-Urban Fertility Disparity in The Gambia: Standardized Rate, Decomposition, Parity Progression, and Determinants

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Researcher ID

Supervisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Record Identifier

Abstract

This cross-sectional design study examined rural-urban fertility differences in The Gambia. We used the 2019-20 Gambia Demographic and Health Survey data. A multi-stage sampling technique was used to select women of reproductive age (8,747 urban & 3,119 rural). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Kitagawa's Decomposition technique, and the negative binomial (NB) model, α = .05. The mean Children Ever Born (CEB) was higher in the rural (3.25 ± 3.02) than in the urban (2.19 ± 2.45) areas. In the urban and rural areas, 82.8% and 95.1% of women aged 45-49 years who had had three children progressed to fourth birth, respectively. The parity progression rate (λ) was lower in the urban (-0.0647) than in the rural (-0.051). The difference between the standardized fertility rates in rural and urban areas was 83.2 in The Gambia, and the effect of the age composition attributable to this difference was 8.11%. The fertility incidence rate ratio (IRR) was 44% (IRR = 1.440, 95% CI [1.371, 1.513], p < .001) higher in the rural than the urban areas. A similar pattern of rural-urban differences in fertility was observed in the full model. Childbearing progression was higher in rural areas than urban areas and rural-urban differences exist in fertility determinants in The Gambia. Thus, rural-urban-specific fertility reduction programs may address the observed fertility differences in the rural and urban areas in The Gambia.

Sustainable Development Goals

Description

Journal Article. Population and Health Research Entity, North-West University, Mafikeng

Citation

Adebowale, A.S et al. 2025. Rural-Urban Fertility Disparity in The Gambia: Standardized Rate, Decomposition, Parity Progression, and Determinants. Journal of Population and Social Studies [JPSS], 33, pp.198-219. http://doi.org/10.25133/JPSSv332025.011

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By