Automatic vs manual assessment of programming tasks
| dc.contributor.author | Pieterse, Vreda | |
| dc.contributor.author | Liebenberg, Janet | |
| dc.contributor.researchID | 10088873 - Liebenberg, Janet Adri | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-02-19T09:44:41Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-02-19T09:44:41Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Lecturers are struggling to keep up with their daily responsibilities because of an ever-increasing workload. Manual programming assessment processes are time-consuming, but a possible solution is to use the assistance of automatic programming assessment methods. In this study, automatic assessment is compared with manual assessment, specifically for programming tasks. The paper concludes that an automatic assessment tool seems to be less feasible for practical tests and exams, but shows promise for the assessment of programs written during practical lab sessions | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Pieterse, V. & Liebenberg, J. 2017. Automatic vs manual assessment of programming tasks. Proceedings of the 17th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, 16-19 Nov, Koli, Finland: 193-194. [https://doi.org/10.1145/3141880.3141912] | en_US |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-1-4503-5301-4 (Online) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10394/26375 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=3141880.3141912 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1145/3141880.3141912 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | ACM | en_US |
| dc.subject | Computer-assisted instruction | en_US |
| dc.subject | Interactive learning environments | en_US |
| dc.title | Automatic vs manual assessment of programming tasks | en_US |
| dc.type | Presentation | en_US |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.61 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: