NWU Institutional Repository

Are the rights of business employees preferred more than the rights of comestic employees?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Chitimira, Howard

Supervisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University

Record Identifier

Abstract

This case note examines, inter alia, the effect of a sequestration order on the debtor and relevant stakeholders such as creditors, shareholders and other interested parties (see s 20 read with s 9, 10, 11, 12, 17, 19, 21, 23, 37 and 38 of the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936 (hereinafter "the Insolvency Act"). The case note further discusses certain requirements for the application of a sequestration order in South Africa (s 9, read with s 10-12 of the Insolvency Act) in light of the judgment in Gungudoo v Hannover Reinsurance Group Africa ((585/11) [2012] ZASCA 83 (30 May 2012) (hereinafter "Gungudoo case"). This case raised some pertinent questions regarding the application and serving of a sequestration order on the debtor, in terms of the Insolvency Act (s 9(4A), 11(2A) and 11(4)).

Sustainable Development Goals

Description

Keywords

Citation

Chitimira, H. 2016. Are the rights of business employees preferred more than the rights of comestic employees? Obiter, 37(2):381-391. [http://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC197438]

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By