NWU Institutional Repository

Exploring risk and resilience as experienced by designated social workers in the Western Cape

dc.contributor.advisorTruter, E.
dc.contributor.advisorFouché, A.
dc.contributor.authorBoonzaaier, Emma
dc.contributor.researchID21293236 - Truter, Elmien (Supervisor)
dc.contributor.researchID11126388 - Fouché, Ansie (Supervisor)
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-22T08:45:44Z
dc.date.available2020-05-22T08:45:44Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.descriptionM (Social Work), North-West University, Vanderbijlpark Campusen_US
dc.description.abstractChild abuse is a known phenomenon reported around the globe, and social workers in the child protection sector are at the forefront of protecting children subjected to the different types of abuse. Child protection social workers (CPSWs) work in hostile working conditions which may hamper service delivery to these children although some CPSWs are resilient. Limited research on the topic of CPSW risk and resilience is available, especially in South Africa (SA). This study is two-fold. First a scoping review which included 32 empirical and peer reviewed articles focused on CPSW risk was conducted and found that risks for CPSWs mostly related to factors on an institutional and community level (unsupportive work spaces, detrimental workplace duties and work pressure) but also on a intrapersonal level (high levels of stress, cynicism, and disengaged coping; being ill prepared for CPSW, and having a personal history of maltreatment). In the scoping review most of the studies included participants from first world countries such as the United States of America, Canada and the United Kingdom. Only four studies were conducted in South Africa. In order to honour diversity and context, more exploratory research is needed in South Africa, therefore the second part of this study explored the experiences of risk and resilience of ten South African designated social workers (South African DSWs) in the Western Cape through semi-structured interviews. Findings from these interviews revealed their adversity to be informed mostly by factors on an institutional level (for example, inadequate resources). Other reported risk factors were embedded on a community (for example, few placement options) and individual level (for example, challenging clients). Findings and recommendations for both studies contribute to the global knowledge base and to the continuous dialogue about risk and resilience of CPSWs.en_US
dc.description.thesistypeMastersen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0509-6067
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/34667
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNorth-West University (South-Africa)en_US
dc.subjectRisk adversityen_US
dc.subjectSocial worken_US
dc.subjectProtection social worken_US
dc.subjectDesignatedvsocial workersen_US
dc.subjectChild protection workersen_US
dc.subjectChild welfare workersen_US
dc.subjectSouth Afrikaen_US
dc.subjectWestern Capeen_US
dc.subjectResilienceen_US
dc.subjectPositive adjustmenten_US
dc.subjectNegative outcomesen_US
dc.subjectBurnouten_US
dc.subjectScoping Reviewen_US
dc.subjectPhenomenologyen_US
dc.titleExploring risk and resilience as experienced by designated social workers in the Western Capeen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Boonzaaier_E_22353054.pdf
Size:
19.32 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections