NWU Institutional Repository

Authority by representation – a new form of authority?

dc.contributor.authorSharrock, RD
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-09T12:50:45Z
dc.date.available2017-05-09T12:50:45Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractThe majority decision in Makate v Vodacom (Pty) Ltd [2016] ZACC 13 recognises a new form of actual authority – authority by representation. However, the decision is based on a misinterpretation of English law and is inconsistent with an extensive body of South African case law and the view held by several South African text–book writers. It remains to be seen whether the decision will be regarded as binding authority. If it is accepted as binding, the principle of agency by representation which it establishes will need to be clarified and developed in certain respects to ensure that it does not operate unfairly.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSharrock, R. 2016. Authority by representation – a new form of authority?. Potchefstroom electronic law journal (PELJ) = Potchefstroomse elektoniese regsblad (PER), 19(1):1-21 [http://www.nwu.ac.za/p-per/index.html]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1727-3781
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/21808
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectAuthorityen_US
dc.subjectEstoppelen_US
dc.subjectLaw of agencyen_US
dc.subjectOstensibleen_US
dc.subjectStare decisisen_US
dc.titleAuthority by representation – a new form of authority?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
47 Sharrock.pdf
Size:
306.22 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: