High-energy pulsar light curves in an offset polar cap B-field geometry
| dc.contributor.author | Barnard, M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Venter, C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Harding, A.K. | |
| dc.contributor.researchID | 12006653 - Venter, Christo | |
| dc.contributor.researchID | 20574266 - Barnard, Monica | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-11-02T08:10:15Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-11-02T08:10:15Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The light curves and spectral properties of more than 200 γ -ray pulsars have been measured in unsurpassed detail in the eight years since the launch of the hugely successful Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT) γ -ray mission. We performed geometric pulsar light curve modelling using static, retarded vacuum, and offset polar cap (PC) dipole B -fields (the latter is characterized by a parameter ε ), in conjunction with standard two-pole caustic (TPC) and outer gap (OG) emission geometries. In addition to constant-emissivity geometric models, we also considered a slot gap (SG) E -field associated with the offset-PC dipole B -field and found that its inclusion leads to qualitatively different light curves. We therefore find that the assumed B -field and especially the E -field structure, as well as the emission geometry (magnetic inclination and observer angles), have a great impact on the pulsar's visibility and its high-energy pulse shape. We compared our model light curves to the superior-quality γ -ray light curve of the Vela pulsar (for energies > 100 MeV). Our overall optimal light curve fit (with the lowest χ 2 value) is for the retarded vacuum dipole field and OG model. We found that smaller values of ε are favoured for the offset-PC dipole field when assuming constant emissivity, and larger ε values are favoured for variable emissivity, but not significantly so. When we increased the relatively low SG E -fields we found improved light curve fits, with the inferred pulsar geometry being closer to best fits from independent studies in this case. In particular, we found that such a larger SG E -field (leading to variable emissivity) gives a second overall best fit. This and other indications point to the fact that the actual E -field may be larger than predicted by the SG model | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Barnard, M. et al. 2016. High-energy pulsar light curves in an offset polar cap B-field geometry. 4th Annual Conference on High Energy Astrophysics in Southern Africa, 25-26 Aug 2016, Cape Town, South Africa. Proceedings of science: Article no 042. [https://pos.sissa.it/275/042/] | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1824-8039 (Online) | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10394/26004 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://pos.sissa.it/275/042/ | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://pos.sissa.it/275/042/pdf | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | HEASA | en_US |
| dc.title | High-energy pulsar light curves in an offset polar cap B-field geometry | en_US |
| dc.type | Presentation | en_US |
