NWU Institutional Repository

Greatness versus smallness: a postcolonial analysis of the healing of Naaman (2 Kings 5)

dc.contributor.authorBerman, Sidney K.
dc.contributor.researchID26761459 - Berman, Sidney Koketso
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-16T09:47:40Z
dc.date.available2017-05-16T09:47:40Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractThis article analyses the dichotomy of greatness versus smallness in 2 Kgs 5. It argues that Naaman's real disease was an unhealthy attitude towards greatness, and Elisha primarily cured it. From the discourse of the story, Aram's and Naaman's looting and oppression of the weaker nation and individuals is borne from this disease. The investigation of this article is also postcolonial, drawing parallels between attitudes and power imbalances in the narrative and those of colonial relationships. The above-named concepts are merged with the method of literary narrative criticism to trace the text's reproof of imperialist ideology.
dc.identifier.citationBerman, S.K. 2016. Greatness versus smallness: a postcolonial analysis of the healing of Naaman (2 Kings 5). Old Testament Essays, 29(3):403-418. [http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2312-3621/2016/v29n3a3]
dc.identifier.issn1010-9919
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2312-3621/2016/v29n3a3
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/24426
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherThe Old Testament Society of Southern Africa (OTSSA)
dc.subjectGreatness
dc.subjectsmallness
dc.subjectNaaman
dc.subjectcolonial
dc.subjectGehazi
dc.subjectElisha
dc.titleGreatness versus smallness: a postcolonial analysis of the healing of Naaman (2 Kings 5)
dc.typeArticle

Files