NWU Institutional Repository

The efficiency of Environmental Authorisation and Prospecting Right applications for Kimberlite prospecting in the North-West Province

dc.contributor.advisorSandham, L.A.
dc.contributor.authorRikhotso, Twarisani Theophillus
dc.contributor.researchID10190198 - Sandham, Luke Alan (Supervisor)
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-23T11:52:52Z
dc.date.available2021-11-23T11:52:52Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.descriptionM (Environmental Management), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campusen_US
dc.description.abstractProspecting for minerals requires an Environmental Authorisation (EA) and a Prospecting Right (PR) which are governed by the National Environmental Management Act (NEMA), No.107 of 1998 (as amended) and the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act (MPRDA), No. 28 of 2002 (as amended) respectively. It therefore becomes imperative for the two authorisation processes to be aligned and implemented efficiently to optimise the successful implementation of the Prospecting Work Programme (PWP) in a socio-economical and environmentally acceptable manner. It is for this reason that this research aims to investigate the extent to which EA and PR applications are implemented efficiently using case studies (Cases) of Kimberlite prospecting applications in the North-West Province. There has been no empirical research that has been undertaken on the efficiency of authorisation processes for prospecting activities. A Mixed Research Approach was adopted in order to achieve the research aim and objectives. Two legislative frameworks were reviewed to address the first research question. The second and third research questions were addressed by document analysis and interviews respectively. Eight Cases were selected, and twenty key stakeholder personnel were interviewed. The findings of this research have concluded that the MPRDA and NEMA are aligned in principle but not in practice. The efficiency of the authorisation processes was measured by plotting the actual timeframes of selected Cases against the legislatively prescribed timeframe. The PR processes were found to be less efficient than the EA processes. The inefficiencies of the PR authorisation process are characterised by delays in the administrative action of accepting or rejecting PR applications and for granting the PR. The inefficiencies of the EA on the other hand comprise of the administrative action of issuing the EA and the appeal decision. This dissertation has determined that the authorisation processes are not implemented as efficiently as could be in the North-West Province. This however, is to the greatest extent so for the PR than the EA authorisation process. Recommendations to improve efficiency and for future studies are presented in this dissertation.en_US
dc.description.thesistypeMastersen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8495-0657
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/37910
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNorth-West University (South Africa)en_US
dc.subjectEfficiencyen_US
dc.subjectTimeframesen_US
dc.subjectDelaysen_US
dc.subjectAuthorisation processesen_US
dc.subjectProspecting Righten_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Authorisationen_US
dc.titleThe efficiency of Environmental Authorisation and Prospecting Right applications for Kimberlite prospecting in the North-West Provinceen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Rikhotso TT 23364947.pdf
Size:
3.44 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: