The application of pharmacoeconomic modelling to estimate a value-based price for new cancer drugs
dc.contributor.author | Dranitsaris, George | |
dc.contributor.author | Lubbe, Martie S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Truter, Ilse | |
dc.contributor.author | Cottrell, Wayne | |
dc.contributor.author | Spirovski, Biljana | |
dc.contributor.researchID | 10069712 - Lubbe, Martha Susanna | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-02-29T09:49:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-02-29T09:49:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Rationale, aims and objectives Value‐based pricing has recently been discussed by international bodies as a means to estimate a drug price that is linked to the benefits it offers patients and society. The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended using three times a country's per capita gross domestic product (GDP) as the threshold for economic value. Using the WHO criteria, pharmacoeconomic modelling was used to illustrate the application of value‐based price towards bevacizumab, a relatively new drug that provides a 1.4‐month survival benefit to patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods A decision model was developed to simulate outcomes in mCRC patients receiving chemotherapy ± bevacizumab. Clinical data were obtained from randomized trials and costs from Canadian cancer centres. Utility estimates were determined by interviewing 24 oncology nurses and pharmacists. A price per dose of bevacizumab was then estimated using a target threshold of $CAD117 000 per quality adjusted life year gained, which is three times the Canadian per capita GDP. Results For a 1.4‐month survival benefit, a price of $CAD830 per dose would be considered cost‐effective from the Canadian public health care perspective. If the drug were able to improve patient quality of life or survival from 1.4 to 3 months, the drug price could increase to $CAD1560 and $CAD2180 and still be considered cost‐effective. Discussion The use of the WHO criteria for estimating a value‐based price is feasible, but a balance between what patients/governments can afford to pay and the commercial viability of the product in the reference country would be required | |
dc.identifier.citation | Dranitsaris, G. et al. 2010. The application of pharmacoeconomic modelling to estimate a value-based price for new cancer drugs . Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 18(2): 343-351. [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01565.x] | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1356-1294 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1365-2753 (Online) | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10394/5950 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01565.x | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01565.x | |
dc.publisher | Wiley | en_US |
dc.subject | Chemotherapy | |
dc.subject | Colorectal cancer | |
dc.subject | Cost analysis | |
dc.subject | Drug pricing | |
dc.subject | Value | |
dc.title | The application of pharmacoeconomic modelling to estimate a value-based price for new cancer drugs | en_US |