NWU Institutional Repository

Assessing health technology implementation during academic research and early-stage development: support tools for awareness and guidance: a review

dc.contributor.authorRoosink, Meyke
dc.contributor.authorVan Gemert-Pijnen,Lisette
dc.contributor.authorVerdaasdonk, Ruud
dc.contributor.authorKelders, M. Saskia
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-03T10:10:48Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.descriptionJournal Article, Faculty of Humanities
dc.description.abstractFor successful health technology innovation and implementation it is key to, in an early phase, understand the problem and whether a proposed innovation is the best way to solve the problem. This review performed an initial exploration of published tools that support innovators in academic research and early stage development with awareness and guidance along the end-to-end process of development, evaluation and implementation of health technology innovations. Tools were identified from scientific literature as well as in grey literature by non-systematic searches in public research databases and search engines, and based on expert referral. A total number of 14 tools were included. Tools were classified as either readiness level tool (n = 6), questionnaire/checklist tool (n = 5) or guidance tool (n = 3). A qualitative analysis of the tools identified 5 key domains, 5 innovation phases and 3 implementation principles. All tools were mapped for (partially) addressing the identified domains, phases, and principles. The present review provides awareness of available tools and of important aspects of health technology innovation and implementation (vs. nontechnological or non-health related technological innovations). Considerations for tool selection include for example the purpose of use (awareness or guidance) and the type of health technology innovation. Considerations for novel tool development include the specific challenges in academic and early stage development settings, the translation of implementation to early innovation phases, and the importance of multi-disciplinary strategic decisionmaking. A remaining attention point for future studies is the validation and effectiveness of (self-assessment) tools, especially in the context of support preferences and available support alternatives
dc.identifier.citationRoosink, M. et al.2024. Assessing health technology implementation during academic research and early-stage development: support tools for awareness and guidance: a review. Volume 6 - 2024. [https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1386998]
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/44592
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherFrontiers Media SA
dc.subjectHealth technology
dc.subjectInnovation
dc.subjectImplementation
dc.subjectSupport tool
dc.subjectMedical device
dc.titleAssessing health technology implementation during academic research and early-stage development: support tools for awareness and guidance: a review
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Roosink_M. et al. 2024.pdf
Size:
373.21 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections