NWU Institutional Repository

Developmental monitoring using caregiver reports in a resource-limited setting: The case of Kilifi, Kenya

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Abubakar, Amina
Bomu, G.
Holding, P.
Van Baar, A.
Van de Vijver, Alphonsius Josephus Rachel

Supervisors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell

Record Identifier

Abstract

Aim:  The main aim of the current study was to evaluate the reliability, validity and acceptability of developmental monitoring using caregiver reports among mothers in a rural African setting. Methods:  A structured interview for parents of children aged 24 months and less was developed through both participant consultation and a review of literature. The reliability and validity of the schedule was evaluated through a 10-month monitoring programme of 95 children, aged 2-10 months. The acceptability of the process was evaluated by studying retention rates and by organizing focus group discussions with participating mothers. Results:  The structured interview 'Developmental Milestones Checklist' consisted of 66 items covering three broad domains of child functioning: motor, language and personal-social development. The interview yielded scores of developmental achievements that showed high internal consistency and excellent test-retest reliability. The results were sensitive to maturational changes and nutritional deficiencies. In addition, acceptable retention rates of approximately 80% were found. Participating mothers reported that they found the procedures both acceptable and beneficialConclusion:  Developmental monitoring using caregiver report is a viable method to identify and monitor at-risk children in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Sustainable Development Goals

Description

Keywords

Citation

Abubakar, A. et al. 2010. Developmental monitoring using caregiver reports in a resource-limited setting: The case of Kilifi, Kenya. Acta paediatrica, 99(2):291-297. Feb.[http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1651-2227]

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By