The fairness of dismissals for misconduct arising from mental illness in South Africa
| dc.contributor.author | Kgokong, Vincent | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-14T09:34:01Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
| dc.description | Master of Laws in Labour Law, North-West University-- Potchefstroom Campus | |
| dc.description.abstract | South African employers face complex challenges in managing employees with mental health conditions, particularly due to limited dedicated legislation. The legal framework protecting employees with mental health conditions is primarily governed by the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (LRA), Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998, and various codes of practice and guidelines. These collectively establish comprehensive protections against discrimination and unfair dismissal. The LRA mandates that all dismissals must meet both substantive and procedural fairness requirements. This becomes particularly sophisticated in cases involving mental illness, where employers must carefully balance organisational needs with employee rights. The Code of Good Practice: Dismissal specifically requires consideration of employees' health and personal circumstances when evaluating the fairness of dismissal decisions. Key legal precedents, including New Way Motor & Diesel Engineering v Marsland and Jansen v Legal Aid South Africa, have established that employers must adopt a compassionate and holistic approach when addressing misconduct related to mental illness. This approach is endorsed in the case of Spero v Elvey International (Pty) Ltd1 and requires employers to consider reasonable accommodations before resorting to dismissal, though they may cite unjustified hardship as a limitation to such accommodations. The current framework emphasises a social model of disability, recognising that disabilities are often created or exacerbated by social environment rather than solely by physical or mental impairments. This perspective requires employers to evaluate both the workplace environment and individual circumstances when managing mental health-related issues, ensuring fair treatment while maintaining operational effectiveness. To understand said obligations, the research uses a desk-top method of research literature published through secondary sources that include articles in journals, academic books, web publications as well as those from primary sources such as legislation, case laws and international conventions. The research will employ a case study methodology to conduct a comprehensive analysis of dismissal practices related to mental health-induced misconduct in South African workplaces. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2367-5709 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10394/43665 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | North-West University. | |
| dc.subject | Dismissal | |
| dc.subject | Misconduct | |
| dc.subject | Mental illness | |
| dc.subject | Fairness | |
| dc.title | The fairness of dismissals for misconduct arising from mental illness in South Africa | |
| dc.type | Thesis |
