NWU Institutional Repository

Importance of detailed soil information for hydrological modelling in an urbanized environment

dc.contributor.authorVan Tol, Johan
dc.contributor.authorVan Zijl, George
dc.contributor.authorJulich, Stefan
dc.contributor.researchID33473706 - Van Zijl, George Munnik
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-20T13:16:54Z
dc.date.available2020-07-20T13:16:54Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractSoil information is critical in watershed-scale hydrological modelling; however, it is still debated which level of complexity the soil data should contain. In the present study, we have compared the effect of two levels of soil data on the hydrologic simulation of a mesoscale, urbanised watershed (630 km2) in central South Africa. The first level of soil data, land type (LT) data, is currently the best, readily available soil information that covers the whole of South Africa. In the LT database, the entire study area is covered by only two soil types. The second level of soil data (DSM) was created by means of digital soil mapping based on hydropedological principles. It resulted in six different soil types with different hydrological behaviour (e.g., interflow, recharge, responsive). The two levels of soil data were each included in the revised version of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT+). To compare the effects of different complexity of soil information on the simulated water balance, the outputs of the uncalibrated models were compared to the three nested gauging stations of the watershed. For the LT scenario, the simulation efficiencies calculated with the Kling–Gupta efficiency (KGE) for the three nested gauging stations (640 km2, 550 km2, 54 km2) of 0, 0.33 and −0.23 were achieved, respectively. Under the DSM scenario, KGE increased to 0.28, 0.44 and 0.43 indicating an immediate improvement of the simulation by integrating soil data with detailed information on hydrological behaviour. In the LT scenario, actual evapotranspiration (aET) was clearly underestimated compared to MODIS-derived aET, while surface runoff was overestimated. The DSM scenario resulted in higher simulated aET compared to LT and lower surface runoff. The higher simulation efficiency of DSM in the smaller headwater catchments can be attributed to the inclusion of the interflow soil type, which covers the governing runoff generation process better than the LT scenario. Our results indicate that simulations benefit from more detailed soil information, especially in smaller areas where fewer runoff generation processes dominateen_US
dc.identifier.citationVan Tol, J. et al. 2020. Importance of detailed soil information for hydrological modelling in an urbanized environment. Hydrology, 7(2): #34. [https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7020034]en_US
dc.identifier.issn2306-5338 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/35214
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/2306-5338/7/2/34/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology7020034
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.subjectHydrological processesen_US
dc.subjectHydropedologyen_US
dc.subjectPredictions in ungauged basinsen_US
dc.subjectSWAT+ modelen_US
dc.titleImportance of detailed soil information for hydrological modelling in an urbanized environmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Importance_of_detailed_soil.pdf
Size:
2.92 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.61 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: