NWU Institutional Repository

Protected by substitute consent as a Human Right: a reformed perspective

dc.contributor.authorRheeder, Riaan Louis
dc.contributor.researchID10200185 - Rheeder, Adriaan Louis
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-15T10:49:40Z
dc.date.available2017-05-15T10:49:40Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractIn 2005, the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (UDBHR) by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) was accepted unanimously by the world community, consisting of 191 member nations, which means that the declaration is currently the first and only bioethical text to which the entire world has committed itself. It must be borne in mind, though, that this document, particularly Article 7 of the UDBHR, is not of religious origin and must therefore be evaluated from a Christian point of view. This article strives to ground the ethical and human-rights issue of substitute consent from a Reformed perspective. The grounding is performed in light of the creation and salvation perspectives.
dc.identifier.citationRheeder, R. 2016.Protected by substitute consent as a Human Right: a reformed perspective. Studies in Christian Ethics, 29(4):437-460. [http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0953946815610023]
dc.identifier.issn0953-9468
dc.identifier.issn1745-5235 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0953946815610023
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/23981
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSage
dc.subjectBest interest
dc.subjectcovenant
dc.subjecthealing
dc.subjectimage of God
dc.subjectmercy
dc.subjectparticipatory decision making
dc.subjectproxy decision making
dc.titleProtected by substitute consent as a Human Right: a reformed perspective
dc.typeArticle

Files