Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMaruping, Segomotso Sophie
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-28T09:44:25Z
dc.date.available2013-10-28T09:44:25Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/9381
dc.descriptionThesis (MCur)--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2013
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to explore nurse educators‟ perception of Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation (OSCE) as summative assessment for students‟ clinical competence ,with the aim of recommending alternatives to the current situation. The rationale behind the study is that the researcher became aware of concerns raised by nurse educators regarding the appropriateness of OSCE as summative assessment of students clinical competence and differences of opinion on the matter. An explorative, descriptive, contextual, qualitative research design was chosen. The sample included nurse educators actively involved in OSCE as summative assessment of nursing students in the provincial nursing college for at least 5 years or more. Data was collected by means of two (2) focus group interview sessions with fourteen (14) participants. During data analysis it became clear that data saturation had not been reached and a third focus group interview was conducted with seven (7) participants from the original sample who were available. The focus of the interviews was to explore participants‟ perception of Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation as summative assessment for students‟ clinical competence. The data was independently analyzed by the researcher as well as an independent co-coder according to the principles for content analysis as described by Creswell (2008:251). Three (3) themes and nine (9) sub-themes emerged from the data collected from participants. The first theme described the value of OSCE as summative assessment method for students‟ clinical competence. Theme two described the obstacles in using OSCE as summative assessment for students‟ clinical competence. Theme three described the suggested alternatives. The collected data was discussed and integrated with relevant national and international literature to culminate in three (3) conclusive statements. The conclusive statements served as basis for recommending alternatives to the nursing educators and managers in order to enhance the value of OSCE as summative assessment forstudents‟ clinical competence.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNorth-West University
dc.subjectPerceptionen_US
dc.subjectNurse educatoren_US
dc.subjectObjective Structured Clinical Evaluation (OSCE)en_US
dc.subjectSummative assessmenten_US
dc.subjectClinical competenceen_US
dc.subjectPersepsieen_US
dc.subjectVerpleegdosenten_US
dc.subjectObjektiewe Gestruktureerde Kliniese Evaluasie (OGKE)en_US
dc.subjectSummatiewe assesseringen_US
dc.subjectKliniese vaardigheiden_US
dc.titleExploring nurse educators' perceptions of objective structured clinical evaluation as summative assessment for students' clinical competenceen
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesistypeMastersen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record