• Login
    View Item 
    •   NWU-IR Home
    • North-West University Journals
    • Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies
    • Jàmbá: 2013 Volume 5 No 1
    • View Item
    •   NWU-IR Home
    • North-West University Journals
    • Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies
    • Jàmbá: 2013 Volume 5 No 1
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Disaster risk assessment at Roburnia Plantation, Mpumalanga, South Africa

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Jamba_v5(1)2013_Makhado_RA_&_Saidi_AT.pdf (412.2Kb)
    Date
    2013
    Author
    Makhado, Rudzani A
    Saidi, Amani T
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This study reports about disaster risk assessment undertaken at Roburnia Plantation, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. Both quantitative and qualitative approaches were followed to collect data. A total of eight experienced foresters and fire fighters were purposively sampled for interview at Roburnia Plantation. A questionnaire survey was also used to collect the data. Risk levels were quantified using the risks equations of Wisner et al. (2004) and the United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR 2002). Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Analysis of variance (ANOVA, single factor) was also applied. This study found that Roburnia Plantation is highly exposed to fire risks. The mean (± s.d.) output from the Wisner risk equation shows that fire is the highest risk at 7.7 ± 0.3, followed by harsh weather conditions at 5.6 ± 0.4 and least by tree diseases, pests and pathogens at 2.3 ± 0.2. Similarly, the mean (± s.d.) output from the UNISDR risk equation also shows that fire is the highest risk at 2.9 ± 0.2, followed by harsh weather conditions at 2.2 ± 0.3 and least by tree diseases, pests and pathogens at 1.3 ± 0.2. There was no significant deference in the risk analysis outputs (p = 0.13). This study also found that the number of fire incidents were low during summer, but increased during winter and spring. This variation is mainly due to a converse relationship with rainfall, because the availability of rain moistens the area as well as the fuel. When the area and fuel is moist, fire incidents are reduced, but they increase with a decrease in fuel moisture.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10394/8932
    Collections
    • Jàmbá: 2013 Volume 5 No 1 [8]

    Copyright © North-West University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of NWU-IR Communities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsAdvisor/SupervisorThesis TypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsAdvisor/SupervisorThesis Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Copyright © North-West University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV