• Login
    View Item 
    •   NWU-IR Home
    • North-West University Journals
    • Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies
    • Jàmbá: 2013 Volume 5 No 2
    • View Item
    •   NWU-IR Home
    • North-West University Journals
    • Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies
    • Jàmbá: 2013 Volume 5 No 2
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Disasters in ‘development’ contexts: contradictions and options for a preventive approach

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Jamba_v5(2)2013_Hewitt_K.pdf (396.4Kb)
    Date
    2013
    Author
    Hewitt, Kenneth
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The relations of development and disaster offer a starting point for an overview of disaster risk reduction (DRR) in African contexts. A social vulnerability approach is adopted with its goal of improving conditions for persons and places most at risk. However, this approach faces serious contradictions in both the disasters and development scenes. Disaster events and losses have grown exponentially in recent decades. So have advances in disaster-related knowledge and the institutions and material resources devoted to disaster management. Evidently, the latter have not reduced disaster incidence or over all losses. Similar contradictions appear in development. By some measures, in most developing countries the economy has grown much faster than population. Yet, indebtedness, unemployment and insecurity seem worse in many countries. Poverty, the avowed target, remains huge in urban, peri-urban and rural areas singled out by disaster losses. Problems also arise from separate treatment of development and disaster. Climate change and the global financial crises challenge some of the most basic assumptions. The promise of ‘developed nations’, built around massive use of fossil fuels, puts global and African economic growth on a collision course with environmental calamity. The 2008 financial crisis has undermined the safety of global majorities, as well as reliance on development assistance. The case for alternatives in development and DRR is reinforced, including the vulnerability-reducing responses highlighted in the Hyogo framework for action. However, this is being undermined by a return to a civil defence-type approach, an increasingly militarised, and for-profit, focus on emergency management.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10394/8931
    Collections
    • Jàmbá: 2013 Volume 5 No 2 [20]

    Copyright © North-West University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of NWU-IR Communities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsAdvisor/SupervisorThesis TypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsAdvisor/SupervisorThesis Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Copyright © North-West University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV