Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilliams, RCen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-06T13:49:04Z
dc.date.available2011-09-06T13:49:04Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.issn1727-3781en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/4693
dc.description.abstractThe Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 defines administrative action as “any decision [of a specified kind]" taken by specified persons or entities. The Act goes on to define decision as “any decision of an administrative nature made, proposed to be made, or required to be made, as the case may be”, including certain specified categories of decision. The decision in Bhugwan v JSE Ltd 2010 3 SA 335 (GSJ) highlights the distinction between a “decision”, as so defined (which may be amenable to judicial review in terms of the Act) and an inchoate decision (that is not amenable to such review).. The judgment in this case is, to date, the only judicial authority in South Africa on this critical threshold requirement to be established by any applicant for judicial review in terms of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act.en_US
dc.subjectAdministrative actionen_US
dc.subjectConstitutionen_US
dc.subjectDecisionen_US
dc.subjectProposed decisionen_US
dc.subjectReviewen_US
dc.subjectPromotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000en_US
dc.titleThe Concept of a "Decision" as the Threshold Requirement for Judicial Review in Terms of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Acten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record