Measurement Invariance of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire Across 17 Countries
Date
2023Author
Schutte, Lusilda
Brdar, Ingrid
Wissing, Marié P.
Tončić, Marko
Araujo, Ulisses
Carlquist, Erik
Solano, Alejandro Castro
Freire, Teresa
Hernández-Pozo, María del Rocío
Jose, Paul E.
Martos, Tamás
Nakamura, Jeanne
Pamela Nuñez del Prado Chaves
Pninit Russo-Netzer
Singh, Kamlesh
Slezackova, Alena
Soosai-Nathan, Lawrence
Unanue, Wenceslao
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The Meaning in Life Questionnaire assesses presence of and search for meaning in
life. Although the questionnaire has shown promising psychometric properties in
samples from diferent countries, the scale’s measurement invariance across a large
number of nations has yet to be assessed. This study is aimed at addressing this gap,
providing insight into how meaning in life is constructed and experienced across
countries and into the extent to which cross-country comparisons can be made. A
total of 3867 adult participants from 17 countries, aged 30–60, balanced by gen der, and with at least secondary education, completed the questionnaire as part of
the Eudaimonic and Hedonic Happiness Investigation. Single sample confrmatory
factor analysis, multigroup confrmatory factor analysis, and alignment optimiza tion were applied to investigate the scale’s performance across the samples. Good
psychometric properties and high levels of approximate measurement invariance
emerged for the Presence subscale after removal of item 9, the only reverse-phrased
item. Performance of the Search subscale varied more across samples, suggesting
caution in interpreting related results supporting approximate measurement invari ance. The conceptualization of presence of meaning operationalized in the corre sponding subscale (without item 9) appears consistent across countries, whereas
search for meaning seems to be less universally homogenous and requires further
exploration. Moreover, the Meaning in Life Questionnaire does not refect the con ceptual distinction between “purpose” and “meaning” currently acknowledged by
researchers. This issue should be further explored in studies addressing the scale’s
performance across cultures
Collections
- NWU Official [165]