Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBakker, Cok
dc.contributor.authorTer Avest, Ina
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-19T11:32:53Z
dc.date.available2022-10-19T11:32:53Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationBakker, C. & Ter Avest, I. 2019. ‘Teacher training for religious education : engaging academics through the Dialogical Self Theory’. Transformation in Higher Education 4:1-9. [https:// doi.org/10.4102/the.v4i0.50]en_US
dc.identifier.issn2415-0991
dc.identifier.issn2519-5638 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/39953
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4102/the.v4i0.50
dc.description.abstractBackground: In the Netherlands, most of the academic curricula for teacher training in religious education (RE) focus on shortfalls of students, like a lack of knowledge about the plurality of worldviews and the diversity in interpretations of the Christian tradition. In our research project, the focus is not on the students, but on the university professors and lecturers who teach the subject of RE: professors and lecturers who train and educate students to teach RE. Aim: The main aim of the project was to gain a better insight into the inherent complexity of the professionalism of academics, that is, their own positionality in the plurality of the Roman Catholic traditions they adhere to in relation to their capabilities and commitment to the current curriculum – the ‘old’ one – and the new curriculum to be developed, in the context of the Dutch plural society. Setting: Respondents in this research were university professors and lecturers of the Teacher Training Institute of Tilburg University, located at Utrecht, the Netherlands. Methods: For this investigation, we used a research instrument based on the dialogical self theory and its self confrontation method for organisations to gain insight into professionals’ own and their colleagues’ positionality regarding teaching RE. Results: Preliminary results show that the self confrontation method for organisations has shown itself to be a challenging instrument to invite academics involved in the process of data construction and data analysis. Conclusion: Based on these results, we recommend to include the research population in a validation process to increase the sustainability of the results and to maximise engagement in the implementation phase of the new curriculum.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAOSISen_US
dc.subjectReligious educationen_US
dc.subjectTeacher trainingen_US
dc.subjectAcademics’ positionalityen_US
dc.subjectNormative professionalismen_US
dc.subjectDialogical Self Theoryen_US
dc.subjectValuation Theoryen_US
dc.titleTeacher training for religious education : engaging academics through the Dialogical Self Theoryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record