Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWolff, Ernst
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-10T07:20:17Z
dc.date.available2011-01-10T07:20:17Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationWOLFF, E. 2006. Hominisation and humanisation: a perspective from the sociology of technics. TD: The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 2(2):231-248, Dec. [http://dspace.nwu.ac.za/handle/10394/3605]en
dc.identifier.issn1817-4434
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/3885
dc.description.abstractThis essay will present a few challenges to a new Humanism from the perspective of the sociology of technics. For this purpose Humanism will be described as an effort to intervene in the process of human formation or hominisation. In order to intervene an understanding of this process is needed. Hominisation starts in the Palaeolithic era: technics, religion, language and the human being mutually give birth to one another. Reference will be made especially to the work of Leroi-Gourhan and Girard to analyse this point. Hominisation, however, is a continuous process and has not come to an end. The most recent phase of our hominisation is the industrial revolution: Western modernisation seems to be the future of global humanity. But industrialisation spreads unevenly, leading to a varied network of the human conditions, of advantages and disadvantages. A critical assessment of Africa’s position in the global politics of technics will lead to a description of inhuman conditions as part of the network of industrialisation. The scale and extent of misery tolerated and produced by this era of hominisation could be considered as a possible springboard from where to reflect on a contemporary global Humanism even after the ‘death of God’ in modernity. But to what extent does modernisation allow intervention in the process of industrial hominisation in order to give it the quality of humanization? Aspects of theories on multiple or alternative modernities are considered. A suggestion to the kind of humanist orientation solicited by the inhuman condition of misery is presented with reference to Nussbaum’s capabilities theory. Finding the content of a new Humanism is, however, only a beginning of a new humanization. The technical conditions for the possibility of a new Humanism and of its transmission are reflected on. In conclusion, on the basis of the preceding analyses, five technics-orientated tasks for a new Humanism will be identified.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherDepartment of Philosophy, University of Pretoriaen
dc.subjectNew humanismen
dc.subjectSociology of technicsen
dc.subjectHominisationen
dc.subjectPaleolithic eraen
dc.subjectCultural historyen
dc.subjectEthologyen
dc.subjectNetwork formationen
dc.subjectModernisationen
dc.subjectAfricaen
dc.subjectCapabilities theoryen
dc.subjectGlobalisationen
dc.subjectHomogenisationen
dc.titleHominisation and humanisation: a perspective from the sociology of technicsen
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record