Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSibanda, Aubrey
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-04T09:41:01Z
dc.date.available2022-03-04T09:41:01Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationSibanda, A. 2021. Shareholder oppression as corporate conduct repugnant to public policy : infusing the concept of Ubuntu in the interpretation of Section 163 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 Potchefstroomse elektroniese regsblad = Potchefstroom electronic law journal, 2021(24):1- [http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2021/v24i0a10731]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1727-3781
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/38758
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2021/v24i0a10731
dc.description.abstractThe concept of ubuntu continues to exert considerable influence on the development and the general application of post-independence jurisprudence in South Africa. While ubuntu undoubtedly permeates the interpretation of a plethora of contemporary legal disciplines in South Africa, this article contends that the reception of the concept in corporate law remains constrained. Identifying shareholder relationships as an important feature of the corporate firm, the author presents a persuasive case for the infusion of ubuntu and its underlying equity considerations in the interpretation of the oppression remedy which is currently provided under section 163 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008. The article discusses the remedy from different legal perspectives which find synchrony in the concept of ubuntu. The contribution adds to emerging legal scholarship advocating the alignment of South African corporate law with constitutional principles.en_US
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPER/PELJen_US
dc.subjectCorporate governanceen_US
dc.subjectShareholder oppressionen_US
dc.subjectOppression remedyen_US
dc.subjectuBuntuen_US
dc.subjectContracten_US
dc.subjectPublic policyen_US
dc.subjectConstitutionalismen_US
dc.titleShareholder oppression as corporate conduct repugnant to public policy : infusing the concept of Ubuntu in the interpretation of Section 163 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record