Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOsman, Fatima
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-04T08:21:37Z
dc.date.available2022-03-04T08:21:37Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationOsman, F. 2021. Comment on the single marriage statute : implications for customary marriages. Potchefstroomse elektroniese regsblad = Potchefstroom electronic law journal, 2021(24):1-18 [http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727- 3781/2021/v24i0a10471]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1727-3781
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/38751
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727- 3781/2021/v24i0a10471
dc.description.abstractThe South African Law Reform Commission has proposed a single marriage statute to reconcile the several enactments regulating marriage in South Africa. This comment argues that the Bill should include old customary marriages in its definition of a customary marriage and is underinclusive in its recognition of polygyny with a religious or cultural basis and not the more general practice of polygamy. Furthermore, the requirement of cohabitation for the recognition of a life partnership is onerous and may exclude vulnerable parties from protection. While the Bill is commended for requiring a husband to obtain the consent of existing wives before he concludes a further marriage, the note recommends that the Bill give meaning to the notion of consent. Finally, the Bill must address existing issues within the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998 which have invalidated a range of customary marriages too often at the expense of women.en_US
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPER/PELJen_US
dc.subjectSingle Marriage Statuteen_US
dc.subjectCustomary marriageen_US
dc.subjectPolygynyen_US
dc.subjectLife partnershipen_US
dc.titleComment on the single marriage statute : implications for customary marriagesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record