Defining fairness in dismissals of unauthorised foreign nationals
Abstract
It is trite that if a person's employment is prohibited by law it is
not possible for such a person to perform his or her work
lawfully. However, people are employed despite failing to
comply with statutory requirements. One such class of persons
consists of unauthorised foreign nationals. This arises in
circumstances where they are employed without work permits or
where their work permits expire during employment. The Labour
Court in Discovery Health Limited v CCMA 2008 7 BLLR 633
(LC) has affirmed that the absence of a valid work permit does
not invalidate the contract of employment, thereby endorsing the
fact that unauthorised foreign nationals are regarded as
employees. While the Labour Court has confirmed that
unauthorised foreign nationals are subject to labour law
protection, notably the right not to be unfairly dismissed, it is
irrefutable that employers are permitted to dismiss such
employees. However, these dismissals must be fair.
Unfortunately, there is no clarity on what constitutes a fair
dismissal in such circumstances. Although the CCMA relying on
the decision of Discovery Health is substantially unanimous in
finding that unauthorised foreign nationals have the right to
utilise the unfair dismissal machinery sanctioned in the Labour
Relations Act 66 of 1995, its decisions are plagued with
inconsistency when it comes to determining fairness.
Furthermore, no specific guidance has been forthcoming from
the Labour Court. Considering the fact that migration to South
Africa is rife, resulting in many foreign nationals being
employed, this is an important aspect of the law. Therefore, this
article explores the substantive and procedural fairness
requirements of such dismissals. Having clarity of the legal
requirements that apply will aid the fair treatment of foreign
nationals who face dismissals due to the absence of valid work
permits. This is significant, as South African labour law places a
high premium on the fair dismissal of all employees. Apart from
being legislated in the LRA, this right is also a constitutional
imperative.
Collections
- PER: 2020 Volume 23 [48]
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
The role of human dignity in the assessment of fair compensation for unfair dismissals
Vettori, S (2012)South African labour law is concerned with the attainment of fairness for both the employer and the employee. In weighing up the interests of the respective parties it is of paramount importance to ensure that a delicate ... -
Automatically unfair and operational requirement dismissals: making sense of the 2014 amendments
Newaj, Kamalesh; Van Eck, Stefan (2016)This article explores the concept of the automatic unfair dismissal that is regulated in s 187(1)(c) of the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (LRA), where the reason for the dismissal is to "compel the employee to accept a ... -
Het motivationele proces van het Job Demands-Resources Model bij vrijwillig en onvrijwillig ontslagen werknemers tijdens de opzegtermijn
Peeters, Ellen R.; Van de Ven, Bart; De Cuyper, Nele; Vlerick, Peter; De Witte, Hans (Boom Lemma, 2014)This study examines the motivational process of the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) Model in a sample of recently dismissed (voluntary and involuntary) Flemish employees (N = 213). Specifically, the relations between three ...