State use provisions for patent law, and expropriations : some comparative law guidelines for South Africa during the Covid-19 crisis and beyond
Abstract
This article views section 4 of the Patents Act 57 of 1978 against
section 25 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa,
1996 and Article 31 of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects
of Intellectual Property Rights of 1994 (hereafter TRIPS). The
purpose is to find a suitable framework for the state/government
use/utilisation of patented products or processes for public
purposes. A comparison is done with the Crown use provisions
in United Kingdom, Australian and Canadian law to find a
suitable approach to questions relating to remuneration for state
use, the prior negotiations requirement set by Article 31 of
TRIPS, and the public purposes and exclusive patent rights that
would be included under state use. The COVID-19 international
pandemic has caused a state of national disaster in South Africa,
which is exactly the kind of situation of extreme urgency
envisioned by the exception in Article 31 of TRIPS, which permits
the state use of patents without requiring prior negotiations with
the patent owner. In the battle against COVID-19 and its
concomitant fallout, the South African government (and
authorised private parties) would be permitted to utilise patent
rights without explicit authorisation from the patent owner and
without prior negotiations, but subject to the payment of
reasonable remuneration by the government and other terms
and conditions as agreed upon or as determined by a court. This
may include making (manufacturing), using, exercising, and
importing patented products (for example, personal protective
equipment, pharmaceuticals, ventilators and diagnostic tests)
deemed necessary in the fight against COVID-19. Foreign
jurisdictions considered in this article indicate that section 4 of
the Patents Act 57 of 1978 may certainly benefit from an update
to provide detailed guidance on the state use of patented
products or processes for public purposes. In the interest of a
timeous offensive against the COVID-19 virus, the patent
provisions need a speedy update to allow state use compliant
with TRIPS and the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa,
1996.
Collections
- PER: 2020 Volume 23 [48]
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Extracting complexity metrics of technological artifacts and systems from patents using patent document structure
Nel, D. (North-West University, 2018)This study investigates the relationship between different complexity metrics from the literature and metadata fields in patents. Patent citations, claims and other fields are compared against complexity metrics derived ... -
Quo Vadis Patent Litigation : Ascendis Animal Health (Pty) Limited v Merck Sharpe Dohme Corporation 2020 1 SA 327 (CC) - in search of the bigger picture on Patent Validity
Shozi, Bonginkosi; Vawda, Yousuf A. (PER/PELJ, 2021)In October 2019 the Constitutional Court (CC) handed down judgment in the matter of Ascendis Animal Health (Pty) Limited v Merck Sharpe Dohme Corporation 2020 1 SA 327 (CC). This is its first judgment dealing with the ... -
Traditional knowledge and patent protection: Conflicting views on international patent standards
Andrzejewski, Adam (North-West University (Potchefstroom Campus), Faculty of Law, 2010)As diseases continue to spread around the globe, pharmaceutical and biotech companies continue to search for new and better drugs to treat them. Most of these companies have realised that useful compounds for these purposes ...