State use provisions for patent law, and expropriations : some comparative law guidelines for South Africa during the Covid-19 crisis and beyond
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
PER/PELJ
Abstract
This article views section 4 of the Patents Act 57 of 1978 against
section 25 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa,
1996 and Article 31 of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects
of Intellectual Property Rights of 1994 (hereafter TRIPS). The
purpose is to find a suitable framework for the state/government
use/utilisation of patented products or processes for public
purposes. A comparison is done with the Crown use provisions
in United Kingdom, Australian and Canadian law to find a
suitable approach to questions relating to remuneration for state
use, the prior negotiations requirement set by Article 31 of
TRIPS, and the public purposes and exclusive patent rights that
would be included under state use. The COVID-19 international
pandemic has caused a state of national disaster in South Africa,
which is exactly the kind of situation of extreme urgency
envisioned by the exception in Article 31 of TRIPS, which permits
the state use of patents without requiring prior negotiations with
the patent owner. In the battle against COVID-19 and its
concomitant fallout, the South African government (and
authorised private parties) would be permitted to utilise patent
rights without explicit authorisation from the patent owner and
without prior negotiations, but subject to the payment of
reasonable remuneration by the government and other terms
and conditions as agreed upon or as determined by a court. This
may include making (manufacturing), using, exercising, and
importing patented products (for example, personal protective
equipment, pharmaceuticals, ventilators and diagnostic tests)
deemed necessary in the fight against COVID-19. Foreign
jurisdictions considered in this article indicate that section 4 of
the Patents Act 57 of 1978 may certainly benefit from an update
to provide detailed guidance on the state use of patented
products or processes for public purposes. In the interest of a
timeous offensive against the COVID-19 virus, the patent
provisions need a speedy update to allow state use compliant
with TRIPS and the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa,
1996.
Description
Citation
Du Bois, M. 2020. State use provisions for patent law, and expropriations : some comparative law guidelines for South Africa
during the Covid-19 crisis and beyond. Potchefstroomse elektroniese regsblad = Potchefstroom electronic law journal, 2019(22):1-35 [http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-
3781/2020/v23i0a8150]