dc.contributor.author | De Villiers, Jan-Harm | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-02-22T13:59:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-02-22T13:59:58Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.citation | De Villiers, J-H. 2020. Thinking-of-the-Animal-Other with Emmanuel Levinas. Potchefstroomse elektroniese regsblad = Potchefstroom electronic law journal, 2019(22):1-18 [http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-
3781/2020/v23i0a8974] | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1727-3781 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10394/38491 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-
3781/2020/v23i0a8974 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article situates the texts in which Emmanuel Levinas directly
addresses questions of animality against the backdrop of his
larger oeuvre and argues that, despite an explicit attempt to
arrange a privileged ethical (dis)position for humans, Levinas'
ethical logic opens onto a deeper conception of ethics without
boundaries or a priori content. Juxtaposing Levinas' ethical
subjectivity with the relational structure underlying the prominent
models of animal rights, it proceeds to examine the implications
of Levinas' ethics for a theory of animal rights. The article
concludes that Levinas' theory is not logically consistent with a
thematisation of the ethical claims of animals in the language of
rights and that it is best utilised as a framework within which to
deconstruct the inherent anthropocentric character of current
models of animal rights. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | PER/PELJ | en_US |
dc.subject | Emmanuel Levinas | en_US |
dc.subject | Animal ethics | en_US |
dc.subject | Animal rights theory | en_US |
dc.title | Thinking-of-the-Animal-Other with Emmanuel Levinas | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |