Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRakumakoe, D.M.
dc.contributor.advisorRheeders, M.
dc.contributor.advisorBurger, J.R.
dc.contributor.authorDu Toit, Mariëtte
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-28T07:01:11Z
dc.date.available2019-11-28T07:01:11Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7569-7437
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/33757
dc.descriptionMPharm (Advanced Clinical Pharmacy), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campusen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The burden of resistant bacteria is increasing and to ensure optimal treatment with the antibiotics currently available, therapeutic drug monitoring should be performed when prescribing aminoglycosides. Aminoglycosides are very effective in treating resistant gram-negative bacteria, but their use is limited by toxicity. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is essential to ensure that aminoglycoside peak concentrations are high enough for effective antimicrobial treatment and trough levels are low enough to minimise toxicity. Toxicity of aminoglycosides include reversible renal toxicity and irreversible ototoxicity. Inappropriate utilisation of TDM may lead to suboptimal therapy, toxicity and waste of resources that are already scarce in South Africa. The study aim was to investigate the standard of aminoglycoside TDM in a South African private hospital. The study determined whether dosage changes were made when the drug levels were outside the normal ranges, whether TDM was being done according to guidelines, and if samples were drawn at the correct times. Method: Retrospective data from November 2014 to October 2016 was used in this observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study, performed in a 221-bed private hospital in the Western Cape. All adult patients, older than 18 years, who were treated with intravenous amikacin or gentamicin for more than 48 hours, were included. A computerised database and patient files were used to obtain the information required for this study. Descriptive statistical analyses were used to describe and summarise data. Results: One hundred and three (103) patients were included: 65 patients on gentamicin and 38 on amikacin. Blood levels were performed on only 19 gentamicin (29.23%) and 22 amikacin (57.89%) patients. Trough levels were taken more than 2 hours before the next dose in 12 gentamicin (63.16%) and 12 amikacin (54.54%) patients. The majority of patients (96.92% on gentamicin and 84.21% on amikacin) received once daily doses. Therapeutic drug monitoring was performed in all patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) lower than 60 mL/min/1.73m2 and in 23.31% of gentamicin patients and 56.76% of amikacin patients with an eGFR higher than 60 mL/min/1.73m2. All samples taken were trough levels and no peak levels were done. If a blood level was too high, the next dose was omitted. Conclusions: Incorrect sampling times and unnecessary levels taken in patients with normal renal function indicate a need for aminoglycoside treatment guidelines in the private hospital.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNorth-West University (South-Africa).en_US
dc.subjectAminoglycosidesen_US
dc.subjectAmikacinen_US
dc.subjectGentamicinen_US
dc.subjectPrivate hospitalen_US
dc.subjectWestern Capeen_US
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_US
dc.subjectTherapeutic drug monitoringen_US
dc.titleTherapeutic drug monitoring of gentamicin and amikacin in hospitalised patients in a private hospital, Western Capeen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesistypeMastersen_US
dc.contributor.researchID11341882 - Rakumakoe, Dorcas Mmeleng (Supervisor)
dc.contributor.researchID10064117 - Rheeders, Malie (Supervisor)
dc.contributor.researchID10730982 - Burger, Johanita Riette (Supervisor)


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record