The appointment of a proxy "At any time" in terms of section 58 of the companies Act 71 of 2008: Richard Du Plessis Barry v Clearwater estates NPC  ZASCA 11
MetadataShow full item record
Section 58(1) of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 gives a shareholder the right to appoint a proxy "at any time" for the purpose of participating in, speaking and voting on behalf of that shareholder at a shareholders′ meeting, or providing or withholding written consent on behalf of the shareholder in terms of section 60. One important issue that arises in regard to the appointment of a proxy relates to the proper interpretation of section 58(1) of the Companies Act 71 of 2008, namely whether this section, as read with section 58(3)(c), constitutes an unalterable provision giving a shareholder an unlimited right to appoint a proxy "at any time" before the proxy exercises the shareholder's rights at the shareholders meeting, or whether the time period within which the instrument of a proxy′s appointment must be delivered to the company may be restricted by the MOI. This issue was considered by the SCA in the Richard Du Plessis Barry case in view of the appellant′s contention that the provisions of the MOI that limited the time period within which the instrument appointing a proxy must be delivered to the company, or other person on behalf of the company, were valid. In this note, I examine the Richard Du Plessis Barry case with a focus on the proper interpretation of the right of a shareholder to appoint a proxy "at any time" as conferred by section 58(1) of the Companies Act 71 of 2008. I provide some critical comments on the main issues that this judgement raises, including the interpretation of section 58(1) in the context of "alterable" and "unalterable" provisions of the Companies Act 71 of 2008, a purposive interpretation of section 58(1), the interaction between section 58(1) and section 58(3)(c), the significance of the difference in the wording of section 58(1) of the Companies Act 71 of 2008 and section 189 of the previous Companies Act 61 of 1973, as well as the practical implications of the court's decision in this matter. This is followed by a brief comparative analysis with selected international jurisdictions and some concluding remarks.
- PER: 2019 Volume 22 
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Characterization of satellite-based proxies for estimating nucleation mode particles over South Africa Sundström, A.-M.; Laakso, L.; Beukes, J.P.; Van Zyl, P.G.; Josipovic, M.; Venter, A.D.; Jaars, K.; Pienaar, J.J.; Piketh, S.; Chiloane, E.K. (EGU, 2015)Proxies for estimating nucleation mode number concentrations and further simplification for their use with satellite data have been presented in Kulmala et al. (2011). In this paper we discuss the underlying assumptions ...
A late Pleistocene-Holocene multi-proxy record of climate variability in the Jazmurian playa, southeastern Iran Vaezi, Alireza; Kylin, Henrik; Ghazban, Fereydoun; Tavakoli, Vahid; Routh, Joyanto (Elsevier, 2019)We present a multi-proxy record from a 5-m long sediment core from the Jazmurian playa in southeastern Iran to provide insights into globally-recognized major climatic events since the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). In ...
Medicine possession ratio as proxy for adherence to antiepileptic drugs: prevalence, associations, and cost implications Jacobs, Karen; Julyan, Marlene; Lubbe, Martie S.; Burger, Johanita R.; Cockeran, Marike (Dovepress, 2016)Objective: To determine the adherence status to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) among epilepsy patients; to observe the association between adherence status and age, sex, active ingredient prescribed, treatment period, and ...