Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRetief, F.P.
dc.contributor.advisorWessels, J.A.
dc.contributor.authorHowarth, J.
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-17T09:22:08Z
dc.date.available2018-10-17T09:22:08Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0124-1581
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/31431
dc.descriptionMasters of Environmental Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus
dc.description.abstractThis research critically evaluates negotiated environmental agreements in South Africa and entails a single case study in the mining industry regarding the use of a voluntary environmental agreement to prevent water pollution. The objectives of the research include the identification of criteria for evaluating negotiated environmental agreements and the critical evaluation of a negotiated environmental agreement in South Africa within its own regulatory regime. This is a phenomenological study as the author was involved in the process of negotiating and drafting the environmental agreement. Data was collected in the form of a literature review, interviews with role players involved in the case study, and the review of relevant documents, including policies and procedures. The researcher identified a number of criteria for the successful conclusion of negotiated environmental agreements in the mining industry in South Africa. These included a legal and policy framework; mutual trust between parties; a clear desire by both parties to reach a mutually satisfactory agreement; the so-called "soft effect" (which relates to changes in attitude and awareness); community trust in the industry; a public participation process; clear and measurable objectives, targets and time frames as well as negotiated commitments; clearly established monitoring procedures; sufficient sanctions or incentives to ensure compliance; adequate financial and human resources; the extent to which the voluntary agreement contributed to the achievement of the objectives in terms of environmental effectiveness; whether the voluntary agreement promotes compliance with the objectives of the applicable legislation; and stakeholders established for ongoing monitoring and reporting of implementation of the voluntary agreement. A critical evaluation of the agreement of the case study at hand reflected that certain of the identified criteria were not met.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNorth-West Universityen_US
dc.subjectNegotiated environmental agreementsen_US
dc.subjectevaluationen_US
dc.subjectsingle case studyen_US
dc.subjectmining industryen_US
dc.subjectcriteriaen_US
dc.subjectphenomenological studyen_US
dc.titleA critical evaluation of negotiated environmental agreements - a case study from South Africaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesistypeMastersen_US
dc.contributor.researchID12307807 - Retief, Francois Pieter (Supervisor)
dc.contributor.researchID11832509 - Wessels, Johannes Albertus (Supervisor)


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record