Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrownstein, Callum G.
dc.contributor.authorHowatson, Glyn
dc.contributor.authorAnsdell, Paul
dc.contributor.authorŠkarabot, Jakob
dc.contributor.authorFrazer, Ash
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-26T06:09:27Z
dc.date.available2018-09-26T06:09:27Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationBrownstein, C.G. et al. 2018. Motor cortical and corticospinal function differ during an isometric squat compared with isometric knee extension. Experimental physiology, 103(9):1251-1263. [https://doi.org/10.1113/EP086982]en_US
dc.identifier.issn0958-0670
dc.identifier.issn1469-445X (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/31109
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1113/EP086982
dc.identifier.urihttps://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1113/EP086982
dc.description.abstractIt has been suggested that task‐specific changes in neurophysiological function (neuroplasticity) should be assessed using testing modalities that replicate the characteristics of the intervention. The squat is a commonly prescribed resistance exercise that has been shown to elicit changes in CNS function. However, previous studies have assessed squat‐induced neuroplasticity using isometric knee extension, potentially confounding the results. The aim of the present study was to assess the agreement between corticospinal and intracortical activity relating to the knee extensors during isometric knee extension compared with an isometric squat task. Eleven males completed a neurophysiological assessment in an isometric squat (IS) and knee‐extension (KE) task matched for joint angles (hip, knee and ankle). Single‐ and paired‐pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was delivered during isometric contractions at a range of intensities to assess short‐interval cortical inhibition (SICI) and corticospinal excitability. Group mean values for SICI (70 ± 14 versus 63 ± 12% of unconditioned motor evoked potential during IS and KE, respectively) and corticospinal excitability (mean differences 2–5% of the maximal compound muscle action potential at 25, 50, 75 and 100% maximal voluntary contraction between the IS and KE) were not different between the two tasks (P > 0.05) in the vastus lateralis. However, limits of agreement were wide, with poor‐to‐moderate average intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) (SICI, ICC3,1 = 0.15; corticospinal excitability, average ICC3,1 range = 0.0–0.63), indicating disparate corticospinal and intracortical activity between the IS and KE. These data highlight the importance of task specificity when assessing the modulation of corticospinal excitability and SICI in response to interventions resulting in neuroplastic changesen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.subjectSquaten_US
dc.subjectTask specificityen_US
dc.subjectTranscranial magnetic stimulationen_US
dc.titleMotor cortical and corticospinal function differ during an isometric squat compared with isometric knee extensionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.researchID26084759 - Howatson, Glyn


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record