• Login
    View Item 
    •   NWU-IR Home
    • Journals
    • PER: Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
    • PER: 2017 Volume 20
    • View Item
    •   NWU-IR Home
    • Journals
    • PER: Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
    • PER: 2017 Volume 20
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Claiming Damages where Dividends remain Unpaid: A Contribution towards a More Balanced Approach in South Africa

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Claiming Damages where Dividends remain Unpaid: A Contribution towards a More Balanced Approach in South Africa (301.3Kb)
    Date
    2017-11-02
    Author
    Kilian, C G
    Snyman van Deventer, E
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    In the matter between Sumiseki Materials Co Ltd v Wambo Coal Pty Ltd 2013 NSWSC 235 (25 Mar 2013) the Supreme Court of New South Wales had to decide on the legal difficulty arising from unpaid dividends. The Court was required to decide whether a shareholder has a right to a predetermined annual dividend. The principles applied by the Supreme Court entailed estoppel (common law), minority oppression (company law) and contractual law principles. Although the principles of estoppel were relevant, these fall outside the ambit of this article concerning unpaid dividends. The Supreme Court cited approximately 40 cases and considered 5000 pages of documentary evidence pertaining to the contractual right to a predetermined dividend. Although the latter seems applicable and relevant to the South African corporate law environment, South African case law does not support it. Besides a contractual right, this article also investigates the Oxford Legal Group case in establishing at least an implied right (based on the doctrine of proper purpose) to claim an undeclared dividend or unauthorised dividend that is contrary to the board of directors discretion not to authorise any dividends. Both these cases argue when and why a court should interfere in company resolutions in striking a better balance between a right to a dividend and a company's discretionary power not to recommend or declare a dividend.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10394/26724
    Collections
    • PER: 2017 Volume 20 [68]

    Copyright © North-West University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of NWU-IR Communities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Copyright © North-West University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV