• Login
    View Item 
    •   NWU-IR Home
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETDs)
    • Theology
    • View Item
    •   NWU-IR Home
    • Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETDs)
    • Theology
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    An evidentiary analysis of doctor Richard Carrier's objections to the resurrection of Jesus Christ

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Hickling_SR_2017.pdf (2.371Mb)
    Date
    2017
    Author
    Hickling, Stewart Ross
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This study examines the writings of a prominent atheist scholar, Doctor Richard Carrier, Ph.D., regarding his view of the resurrection narratives of Jesus Christ as described in the New Testament. In his writings, Carrier questions the veridicality of these resurrection accounts. The main goal of this research project is to distill accepted principles of evidence from established legal precepts in order to determine if Carrier’s views utilize these accepted principles of evidence. Three of Carrier’s contentions against the resurrection of Jesus Christ are analyzed by comparing them with the aforementioned evidentiary principless coming from the Anglo-American/common law tradition. This tradition includes rules/regulations governing the treatment of evidence in legal proceedings that have been in use since the eighteenth century and have long since been accepted in the modern era by countries that employ the Anglo-American common law jurisprudence system. These principles are codified and in use today in the Federal Rules of Evidence and also contained within federal pattern jury instructions both which are used in courts throughout the United States of America. The Federal Rules of Evidence govern the use of evidence in criminal trials and pattern jury instructions are given to jurors in order to educate them on how to interpret evidence they receive for and against criminal defendants. In addition to this analysis, relevant scholarly material to include Christian apologetic literature, and relevant passages of the New Testament are examined to determine if Carrier’s claims regarding the resurrection of Jesus Christ are in accord with the aforementioned accepted principles of evidence
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10394/26396
    https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5246-3045
    Collections
    • Theology [795]

    Copyright © North-West University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of NWU-IR Communities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsAdvisor/SupervisorThesis TypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsAdvisor/SupervisorThesis Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Copyright © North-West University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV