Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCzyz, Stanislaw H.
dc.contributor.authorMoss, Sarah J.
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-15T07:22:05Z
dc.date.available2017-05-15T07:22:05Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationCzyz, S.H. & Moss, S.J. 2016. Specificity vs. generalizability: emergence of especial skills in classical archery. Frontiers In psychology, 7: Article no 1178. [https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01178]
dc.identifier.issn1664–1078 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/23107
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01178
dc.description.abstractThere is evidence that the recall schema becomes more refined after constant practice. It is also believed that massive amounts of constant practice eventually leads to the emergence of especial skills, i.e., skills that have an advantage in performance over other actions from within the same class of actions. This advantage in performance was noticed when one-criterion practice, e.g., basketball free throws, was compared to non-practiced variations of the skill. However, there is no evidence whether multi-criterion massive amounts of practice would give an advantage to the trained variations of the skill over non-trained, i.e., whether such practice would eventually lead to the development of (multi)-especial skills. The purpose of this study was to determine whether massive amount of practice involving four criterion variations of the skill will give an advantage in performance to the criterions over the class of actions. In two experiments, we analyzed data from female (n = 8) and male classical archers (n = 10), who were required to shoot 30 shots from four accustomed distances, i.e., males at 30, 50, 70, and 90 m and females at 30, 50, 60, and 70 m. The shooting accuracy for the untrained distances (16 distances in men and 14 in women) was used to compile a regression line for distance over shooting accuracy. Regression determined (expected) values were then compared to the shooting accuracy of the trained distances. Data revealed no significant differences between real and expected results at trained distances, except for the 70 m shooting distance in men. The F-test for lack of fit showed that the regression computed for trained and non-trained shooting distances was linear. It can be concluded that especial skills emerge only after very specific practice, i.e., constant practice limited to only one variation of the skill
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherFrontiers Media SA
dc.subjectEspecial skill
dc.subjectMotor learning
dc.subjectSpecificity of practice
dc.subjectVariability of practice
dc.subjectConditions of practice
dc.subjectSchema theory
dc.titleSpecificity vs. generalizability: emergence of especial skills in classical archery
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.researchID24923796 - Czyz, Stanislaw Henryk
dc.contributor.researchID10210407 - Moss, Sarah Johanna


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record