Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVan der Walt, Johann L.
dc.contributor.authorSteyn, H.S.
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-13T09:52:02Z
dc.date.available2017-02-13T09:52:02Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationVan der Walt, J.L. & Steyn, H.S. 2014. Towards standardisation: a comparison of two versions of an academic literacy test. Journal for language teaching, 48(1):109-129. [http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jlt.v48i1.6]en_US
dc.identifier.issn0259-9570
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/20288
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jlt.v48i1.6
dc.descriptionEnter any additional information or requests for the Library here.en_US
dc.description.abstractAll versions of a standardised test should be at similar difficulty levels. In this article, we investigate whether two versions of TAG ("Toets van Akademiese Geletterdheidsvlakke") are valid and whether they are at the same difficulty level. A group of students wrote two versions of the test within a ten-week period. We first investigated their validity in terms of sampling, scoring and construct evidence. Before comparing the tests, we checked whether the classes the study population attended had any effect on the results of the second test. We then compared the scores of the tests by means of a Rasch analysis, an equipercentile measure and a Bland-Altman plot. Test 2 proved to be easier than Test 1. Various factors may have contributed to this, and although it is hard to achieve in practice, it was clear that further work is required to ensure that TAG tests are at more or less similar difficulty levels.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAALTen_US
dc.subjectStandardisationen_US
dc.subjectAcademic literacyen_US
dc.subjectAssessmenten_US
dc.titleTowards standardisation: a comparison of two versions of an academic literacy testen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.researchID10178309 - Van der Walt, Johannes Lodewyk


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record