| dc.contributor.author | Chitimira, Howard | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2016-11-03T10:47:34Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2016-11-03T10:47:34Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Chitimira, H. 2015. The regulation of insider trading in australia: a historical and comparative analysis. Speculum Juris, 29(0–6986–215–4):86–107. [http://www.scielo.org.za/ ] | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0584–8652 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10394/19299 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/PELJ.V18I2.03 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Notably, in Australia, market abuse practices like market manipulation and other market misconduct practices are expressly prohibited under the Corporations Act as amended by the Financial Services Reform Act. In the light of this, and for the purposes of this article, a brief historical analysis of the market manipulation prohibition will be presented first. Secondly, the available penalties and remedies for market manipulation are discussed. Thereafter, possible recommendations and significant Australian anti-market abuse enforcement approaches that may be utilised in South Africa are briefly stated. Lastly, concluding remarks are provided. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Scielo South Africa | en_US |
| dc.subject | Enforcement | en_US |
| dc.subject | Market abuse | en_US |
| dc.subject | Regulation | en_US |
| dc.subject | Financial markets | en_US |
| dc.subject | Market manipulation | en_US |
| dc.title | The regulation of insider trading in australia: a historical and comparative analysis | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| dc.contributor.researchID | 25319655 – Chitimira, Howard | |
