• Login
    View Item 
    •   NWU-IR Home
    • Research Output
    • Faculty of Health Sciences
    • View Item
    •   NWU-IR Home
    • Research Output
    • Faculty of Health Sciences
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    In vivo efficacy and bioavailability of lumefantrine: evaluating the application of Pheroid technology

    Thumbnail
    Date
    2015
    Author
    Du Plessis, Lissinda H.
    Govender, Katya
    Denti, Paolo
    Wiesner, Lubbe
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    The oral absorption of compounds with low aqueous solubility, such as lumefantrine, is typically limited by the dissolution rate in the gastro-intestinal tract, resulting in erratic absorption and highly variable bioavailability. In previous studies we reported on the ability of Pheroid vesicles to improve the bioavailability of poorly soluble drugs. In the present study a Pro-Pheroid formulation, a modification of the previous formulation, was applied to improve the solubility of lumefantrine after oral administration and compared to lumefantrine in DMSO:water (1:9 v/v) solution (reference solution). A bioavailability study of lumefantrine was conducted in a mouse model in fed and fasted states. When using the reference solution, the bioavailability of the lumefantrine heavily depended on food intake, resulting in a 2.7 times higher bioavailability in the fed state when compared to the fasted state. It also showed large between-subject variability. When formulated using Pro-Pheroid, the bioavailability of lumefantrine was 3.5 times higher as compared to lumefantrine in the reference solution and fasting state. Pro-Pheroid also dramatically reduced the effects of food intake and the between-subject variability for bioavailability observed with the reference. In vivo antimalarial efficacy was also evaluated with lumefantrine formulated using Pro-Pheroid technology compared to the reference solution. The results indicated that lumefantrine in Pro-Pheroid formulation exhibited improved antimalarial activity in vitro by 46.8%, when compared to the reference. The results of the Peters’ 4-day suppressive test indicated no significant difference in the efficacy or mean survival time of the mice in the Pro-Pheroid formulation and reference test groups when compared to the positive control, chloroquine. These findings suggest that using the Pro-Pheroid formulation improves the bioavailability of lumefantrine, eliminates the food effect associated with lumefantrine as well as significantly reduces the between subject variability in bioavailability when compared to the reference solution
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10394/18319
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.10.001
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939641115004026
    Collections
    • Faculty of Health Sciences [2404]

    Copyright © North-West University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of NWU-IR Communities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsAdvisor/SupervisorThesis TypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsAdvisor/SupervisorThesis Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Copyright © North-West University
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV