Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRobinson, J A
dc.date.accessioned2009-03-20T06:10:35Z
dc.date.available2009-03-20T06:10:35Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.issn1727-3781
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/1761
dc.description.abstractSection 18(b) of the Matrimonial Property Act 88 of 1984 allows for non-patrimonial damages to be claimed by a spouse married in community of property against his/her spouse. In Van der Merwe v Road Accident Fund 2006 4 SA 230 (CC) the court extended this exception to the notional purity of community of property to include patrimonial damages on the basis that section 18(b) discriminated unfairly against spouses married in community of property vis-à-vis spouses married out of community. The implications of this decision on commercial intercourse are discussed in this contribution against the background of prior decisions relating to the insolvency of spouses married in community of property.en
dc.titleMatrimonial Property Regimes and Damages: The Far Reaches of the South African Constitutionen
dc.typeArticleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record