dc.contributor.author | Couzens, E | |
dc.contributor.author | Dent, M | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-03-19T07:53:46Z | |
dc.date.available | 2009-03-19T07:53:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Couzens, E. & Dent, M. 2006. Finding NEMA: the National Environmental Management Act, the De Hoop dam, conflict resolution and alternative dispute resolution in environmental disputes. Potchefstroom electronic law journal (PELJ) = Potchefstroomse elektroniese regsblad (PER), 9(3):2-51 [http://www.nwu.ac.za/p-per/index.html] | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1727-3781 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10394/1741 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article considers the proposed De Hoop Dam on the Olifants River, Water
Management Agencies, conflict between government departments and other
organs of state, the involvement of NGOs and conflict-breaching mechanisms.
The point of this article is not to debate the rights and wrongs of the project or
to weigh in on behalf of either side in the dispute, but to show that there is a
genuine dispute about the course which should be followed as well as interests
which were not taken into account properly in the initial impact assessment and
decision-making processes. Consequently, that this was (and is) an appropriate
case for conciliation and dispute resolution mechanisms, which are key – and
underutilised – features of the National Environmental Management Act 107 of
1998 and of the National Water Act 36 of 1998. If this case could be settled by
means of alternative dispute resolution techniques, others might follow and
future environmental disputes be settled with accommodation of a greater
number of interests. The matter discussed in this article is not hypothetical, but
a real and urgent legal and environmental problem. | en |
dc.title | Finding NEMA: the National Environmental Management Act, the De Hoop dam, conflict resolution and alternative dispute resolution in environmental disputes | en |
dc.type | Article | en |