Exploring the effectiveness of disciplinary measures in a North-West Government Department
Abstract
In May 2013, the National Public Service Commission (NPSC) announced that twenty-two
thousand public servants across the country had been charged with misconduct for corrupt
activities and that R 300 million had been recovered from perpetrators.
At face value it can be concluded that the disciplinary measures that are used to deal with
employee misconduct in government are effective. But when a deeper look is taken to determine
whether the measures are effective as far as disciplining employees is concerned, the hidden
truth is uncovered.
This study explored the effectiveness of disciplinary measures in a North-West Government
Department. The aim was to determine whether the measures put in place were effective when it
came to dealing with the misconduct of employees.
A qualitative research approach was used in the study as it provided an in-depth understanding of
the issues under investigation for the purpose of finding answers to the research questions.
Semi-structured and in-depth interviews were used to gather data. The interviews provided much
needed information about the perceptions of employees about the misconduct procedure of the
department.
The findings showed that employees preferred that an internal disciplinary procedure be
formulated instead of relying on the standard Disciplinary Code and Procedure. The findings also
highlighted factors such as the damage to the reputation of an organisation and monetary loss as
some of the consequences of not properly following misconduct procedures of the Department.
The findings also showed that factors such as pressures of life, treatment by management and
low wages were causing employees to commit misconduct in the workplace. Furthermore, acts
of misconduct such as absenteeism, fraud, corruption and late-coming were some of the common
acts of misconduct committed by employees at the North-West Government Department.
The regular training of employees was needed in order to deal effectively with misconduct in the
Department. This study paved a way for future researchers who would like to conduct the same
or similar research.