dc.contributor.author | Meihuizen, Nicholas | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-02-08T09:11:10Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-02-08T09:11:10Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Meihuizen, N. 2013. Autobiographical techniques and the problems of memorial reconstruction: Amis, Coetzee, Kermode and Motion. Scrutiny2: issues in english studies in Southern Africa, 18(1):13-22. [http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rscr20/current] | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1812-5441 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1753-5409 (Online) | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10394/16209 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article examines the various ways Martin Amis, J.M. Coetzee, Frank Kermode and Andrew
Motion approach the problems associated with memorial reconstruction and veracity in their
autobiographical writings. Using as a starting point James Olney’s notion of the “free conceptual
construction” involved in our general way of making sense of the world, the article goes on to
consider the means employed by these writers to negotiate with “the archive of the ‘real’” and
the “archive of ‘fiction’”, to draw on Derrida’s terms (1992), in their various engagements with
the conceptual construction of life stories. A special emphasis is placed on what Derek Attridge
(2004) calls the “singularity” of that construction, its truth to itself as writing | en_US |
dc.description.uri | http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rscr20/current] | |
dc.description.uri | http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rscr20/18/1 | |
dc.description.uri | DOI:10.1080/18125441.2013.803718 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | en_US |
dc.title | Autobiographical techniques and the problems of memorial reconstruction: Amis, Coetzee, Kermode and Motion | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.contributor.researchID | 23459220 - Meihuizen, Nicholas Clive Titherley | |