Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRadebe, Martha Keneilwe
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-21T13:18:30Z
dc.date.available2015-01-21T13:18:30Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationRadebe, M.K. 2014. The unconstitutional practices of the Judicial Service Commission under the guise of Judicial Transformation: Cape Bar Council v Judicial Service Commission [2012] 2 ALL 143 (WCC). Potchefstroom electronic law journal (PELJ) = Potchefstroomse elektroniese regsblad (PER), 17(3):1196-1205 [http://www.nwu.ac.za/p-per/index.html]en_US
dc.identifier.issn1727-3781
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/12999
dc.description.abstractThis contribution aims to point out valuable lessons from the shortcomings of the Judicial Service Commission as highlighted in the case of The Cape Bar Council v The Judicial Service Commission. The case involved the failure by the Judicial Service Commission to fill vacancies at the Western Cape High Court despite there being highly eligible candidates available for appointment. The judgment serves as a reminder to the Judicial Service Commission that as a public functionary it is subject to the rule of law and to the constitutional principles of accountability and transparency. Public functionaries are further reminded that they are subject to constitutional control. Such control is essential in ensuring that any abuse of power does not take place.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectJudicial recommendationsen_US
dc.subjectRule of lawen_US
dc.subjectAccountabilityen_US
dc.subjectTransparencyen_US
dc.subjectPublic functionariesen_US
dc.subjectRationalityen_US
dc.subjectLegalityen_US
dc.subjectJust administrative actionen_US
dc.subjectArbitrarinessen_US
dc.titleThe unconstitutional practices of the Judicial Service Commission under the guise of Judicial Transformation: Cape Bar Council v Judicial Service Commission [2012] 2 ALL 143 (WCC)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record