Pelvic biomechanics and muscle activation patterns during non–weighted squats in U/19 university–level rugby union players
Abstract
Hyperlordosis or anterior pelvic tilt is a common non-neutral spinal posture associated with weak core stability, low back pain and altered lumbopelvic muscle activation patterns. Yet the effects of altered lumbopelvic posture and core stability on muscle activation patterns have not been evaluated during a functional movement. The main purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between pelvic tilt, core stability and muscle activation patterns during non-weighted squats in U/19 university-level rugby union players. A total of 49 rugby union players participated in this study. Pelvic tilt (dominant side) was measured from a digital photo with clear reflector markers on the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) using the Kinovea video analysis software programme (version 0.8.15). Flexibility of the hamstrings, hip flexors and knee extensors was assessed with goniometry. Core stability was assessed using the pressure biofeedback unit and muscle onset times during the ascent phase of non-weighted squats. The onset times of the transverse abdominis (TrA), erector spinae (ES), gluteus maximus (GM) and biceps femoris (BF) muscles were measured using electromyography (EMG). Players were then grouped according to pelvic tilt (anterior and neutral) and by playing position (forwards and backs). The between group differences were evaluated for the above mentioned variables using p-value (statistical significance) and d-value (practical significance) measures. Muscle activation patterns and firing order were determined using descriptive statistics. The mean pelvic tilt of all participants (N=49) was an anterior tilt of 15.35°. When grouped by pelvic tilt, the anterior tilt group showed a mean pelvic tilt of 17.83° (n=27) and the neutral pelvic tilt group showed a mean pelvic tilt of 11.75° (n=22). Despite the differences in pelvic tilt, there was no significant difference in flexibility between the groups. Another controversial result is that the anterior tilt group showed practical significantly better core stability (d=0.54) than the neutral tilt group (46.93° vs 56.3°). During the double leg squat the muscle activation patterns were consistent between the groups. TrA activated first, followed by ES. Thereafter, the BF muscle activated, followed by the GM. The first place activation of TrA is consistent with the literature stating that the deep abdominal stabilisers of individuals with good core stability activate before the movement is initiated. The early onset of muscle activity of ES points to a focus on back extension during the ascent of the squat. Because the pelvic tilt was measured during static standing only, it is unclear whether the players in the neutral tilt group were able to hold the neutral pelvic tilt posture throughout the movement. Research has shown that there is an increased focus on trunk extension during the ascent phase of the squat which is not present during the descent. Future research should focus on assessing the pelvic tilt at the beginning of the ascent phase of the squat to ensure accurate results. The delay in GM activation during the ascent of the squat is concerning. GM acts as a lumbopelvic stabilizer, and its slow activation points to a decrease in lumbopelvic stability. This is very important in weight training, because weight training increases the strain on the lumbar spinal structures, which decreases performance and increases the risk of injury.