Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVan Eeden, Elize S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-26T08:19:09Z
dc.date.available2014-09-26T08:19:09Z
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.citationVan Eeden, E.S. 2013. Debating some past and present research frameworks and methodologies in history on places and their peoples in South Africa. African Historical Review, 45(2):113-142. [http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rahr20#.VB_-mRaq06]en_US
dc.description.abstractHistories regarding places and their peoples in South Africa can be traced to the early days of History being practised as an academic discipline. However, practising this form of history under (and outside) the flag of regional history was formalised only in the mid seventies, while informalised research practices in the field continued as methods complementing various schools of thought. Narrowly perceived local histories were considered as inclusive of the formalised and informalised regional history practices as knowledge contributing towards a broader understanding of a (geographically defined/ politically demarcated) region. Of interest is not only the historiography in this field (of which a few pointers are shared in this discussion) but some of the frameworks and methods to research and to record regional histories that have been used in the past. Equally of interest are the ways in which these frameworks and methods are still applied and thought of as dynamic and progressive to assist the historian to progress towards producing and packaging research as part of a comprehensive, all inclusive approach in creating knowledge as regional history studies. In South Africa, an extensive debate on how regional history studies should be broadly defined and understood when undertaking research, still falls short. This is due to the variety, diversity and complexity of knowledge contributing to the pool of information that should be packaged as regional history studies. To contibute towards a framework of understanding and packaging knowledge in this field of meaning to regional history studies, the reader is further exposed to an extended structure of perhaps understanding and doing research in this field: a field that has always been regarded as having the potential to be both integrative and multidisciplinary by nature. Yet its integrative analytical abilities also rest on the outcome of narrow-defined histories done on spaces and places before it is possible to embark on bigger research analyses in, for example, the spirit of modern social history applications to regional history studies. This discussion on ways to understand the limited past and present of regional studies (historiographically and methodologically) in South Africa is offered to encourage further debate.
dc.description.uri10.1080/17532523.2013.857095
dc.description.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17532523.2013.857095
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis
dc.publisherUNISA Press
dc.subjectLocal history
dc.subjectRegional history
dc.subjectResearch framework
dc.subjectResearch methodology
dc.subjectHistoriography
dc.subjectIntegrative multidisciplinary research
dc.subjectHumanities
dc.subjectSocial sciences
dc.subjectHistory from below
dc.subjectModern social history
dc.titleDebating some past and present research frameworks and methodologies in history on places and their peoples in South Africaen_US
dc.contributor.researchID10065016 - Van Eeden, Elize Sonja


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record